tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21731268.post6944178503127218801..comments2023-09-19T07:53:29.105-04:00Comments on Live, Love, and Learn: We Have More in CommonJohn Hostyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05152742238759546206noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21731268.post-24781839453024329192008-06-12T18:28:00.000-04:002008-06-12T18:28:00.000-04:00Si, se puede.Si, se puede.Johnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03277613176895587358noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21731268.post-89725473118006722392008-06-12T17:03:00.000-04:002008-06-12T17:03:00.000-04:00yes we canyes we canPaul Jamiesonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03052473631921432161noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21731268.post-36115422496682959662008-06-11T15:45:00.000-04:002008-06-11T15:45:00.000-04:00"This false idea of "equality" is part of the radi..."This false idea of "equality" is part of the radical leftist agenda intended to secularize and divide us further."<BR/><BR/>Equality is not the same as sameness.<BR/><BR/>I am not advocating a "Harrison Bergeron" world.<BR/><BR/>Just equality under the law.<BR/><BR/>And every serious person knows that same-sex couples can be, and often are, perfectly suitable parents.<BR/><BR/>As to the secular claim?<BR/><BR/><BR/>"There are neither Jews nor Greeks, slaves nor free people, males nor females. You are all the same in Christ Jesus."Johnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03277613176895587358noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21731268.post-18245257305450724072008-06-11T15:23:00.000-04:002008-06-11T15:23:00.000-04:00"No single family structure is necessarily any bet..."No single family structure is necessarily any better or worse than another, so long as we respect each other."<BR/><BR/>Rubbish<BR/><BR/>In this PC day in age, nothing can be "better" than anything else.<BR/><BR/><BR/>Its ridiculous. Of course some people are better at doing things than others. Of course normal parents are better than same-sex parents.<BR/><BR/>This false idea of "equality" is part of the radical leftist agenda intended to secularize and divide us further.<BR/><BR/>What happened to the Obama/Patrick "yes we can" mantra?<BR/><BR/>Aren't you supposed to be bringing people together?<BR/><BR/>You know, like walking into a party convention intent on dividing people?<BR/><BR/>That doesn't seem to be very Obama like. Why don't you and Toleos and KTN practice what Deval and Obama preach - Unity, togetherness, change!!!!!!!!Paul Jamiesonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03052473631921432161noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21731268.post-22146946229834477762008-06-11T14:05:00.000-04:002008-06-11T14:05:00.000-04:00Jane, I'm glad you added "in modern times", becaus...Jane, I'm glad you added "in modern times", because certainly no one disputes that gender roles have some validity from an evolutionary point of view.<BR/><BR/>The best thing about the 21st century is that we can really be free to do our own thing.<BR/><BR/>No single family structure is necessarily any better or worse than another, so long as we respect each other.Johnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03277613176895587358noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21731268.post-72970100539282559112008-06-11T14:00:00.000-04:002008-06-11T14:00:00.000-04:00Great article, John. I agree with that completely...Great article, John. I agree with that completely. <BR/><BR/>"The idea that men and women are so fundamentally different that relationships must be based on a complementary (and conflicting) balance is not inborn. It is purely a social construct..."<BR/><BR/>This would kinda take the wind out of some anti-gay advocates' sails, doesn't it? To say that people must stay within the confines of their biological gender roles, which I also believe are social constructs in modern times, is so limiting. I think it has long outdated any usefulness it may have had evolutionarily speaking.Jane Knowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13737513919725679578noreply@blogger.com